Learning from Wikipedia – Results from their Fundraising Split Tests

In 2013, Wikipedia needed to do some fundraising to help keep the company on its feet. The money raised would ensure that necessary aspects of the company, such as the servers, could continue to function. Those in charge of the fundraising campaign decided to do some split testing utilizing different banner designs to test visitor reactions. Let’s take a look at what they did, and how it affected their income.

Highlighting – Cyan vs Yellow



Image via Wikimedia Commons

Wikipedia started the testing trying to learn if there was a difference in the color used to highlight some of the text in the banner. Each of these banners were yellow, one with a cyan highlight, and the other with a brighter yellow highlight. These banners were tested in July and August, and they declared the yellow highlight the winner.

                            Cyan      Yellow
Total Donations:            4,337     4,418
Total Clicks:               7,127     7,226
Maximum Donation Amount:     $500      $500
Average Donation Amount:   $12.33    $12.53

Display – Form vs No Form



Image via Wikimedia Commons

In May of 2013, Wikipedia decided to try out their banner split testing to find out whether they would get a better response with or without a form. The form made it easy to select how much a visitor wanted to donate, as well as how. They decided to go with the form variant.

                            Form    No Form
Total Donations:           30,768    28,145
Total Clicks:              45,970    39,919
Maximum Donation Amount:     $759    $1,000
Average Donation Amount:   $13.31    $13.61

Color Differences – Gold vs. Grey



Image via Wikimedia Commons

In December of 2013, Wikipedia split tested with two fundraising banners – gold and grey. The text in each banner was the same. The company hoped to raise $20 million between the two banners. The stats below revealed that gold was more effective:

                            Gold       Gray
Total Donations:            1,918     1,860
Total Clicks:               3,657     3,694
Maximum Donation Amount:     $500      $110
Average Donation Amount:   $12.63    $11.35

Outcomes


Image via Flickr by Giulia Forsythe

One of the most important lessons we can learn from this case is that split testing is important. Wikipedia decided that it was a good idea to experiment with different wording, colors, and types of banners throughout the year. The information they learned allows them to narrow down options to find the best banner for their fundraising projects. As they look through the information presented by the stats, they will be able to see that the gold banner did better overall, form will get more clicks and donations, and yellow highlighting did better than cyan over all. They decided to roll out that final variant to a majority of their traffic during the peak campaign time.

No matter what type of website you have, or whether you’re doing a fundraising project or selling a product, split-testing is a viable option for helping you understand what your customers like to see, and what is most effective for your product, service, or request.

Contact us today to increase your Conversion Rate . . .

We put our money where our mouth is – click here to contact us today and learn how we can drastically increase your website conversion rate for no money up front, and no fees until we get you an increase!

By Jon Correll

Talk to a conversion rate expert now

Contact Us

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.